Jupiter Jupiter 135mm f4 Heritage

Overview

The Jupiter-11 135mm f/4 is a Soviet telephoto lens derived from the German Zeiss Sonnar 135mm f/4, part of the broad family of Jupiter lenses that copied and continued Zeiss designs after World War II. According to the reviews, early versions may actually use Zeiss glass produced in Germany, while later ones may carry different coatings. The lens was produced over a long span; the reviewed copies date from as early as 1959 (an aluminum-bodied example) to as late as 1991 (serial numbers encode the production year in the first two digits). The M42 version reviewed by one commenter is made of brass and is notably heavier than the aluminum variants. It has a cult following largely because it is inexpensive (starting around $45 on eBay) yet capable of producing 'superbe' images with pleasing bokeh at a long focal length. One reviewer summed up its charm by noting he doesn't shoot test charts and brick walls, only life. No established nicknames are evidenced in the reviews.

Verdict: The Jupiter-11 135mm f/4 is a budget-friendly Sonnar-derived telephoto that rewards patient shooters with genuinely lovely, sharp images and soft bokeh. It is ideal for portraits, nature, and telephoto work, particularly on digital mirrorless cameras. Its Achilles' heel is dismal flare resistance, so a hood and careful light management are essential. For photographers who want vintage character on a shoestring and don't mind its quirks, it is an underrated gem.

Optical Character

Bokeh

Beautiful, soft, creamy bokeh; generous even at f/4 thanks to 135mm focal length, with no swirl or bubble effects.

Color

Produces very lovely color images, though specific warm/cold tendencies are unknown.

Sharpness wide open

Pretty good across-frame sharpness even wide open, with some brass copies described as tack sharp into extreme corners.

Flare resistance

One of the worst flare performances encountered, with severe veiling flare even on overcast days.

Contrast

Decent contrast that improves at f/5.6, but can be severely reduced by veiling flare in bright or backlit conditions.

Vignetting

Extreme corners are significantly darker at f/4 and f/5.6, reduced by stopping down further.

Community Insights

What people love

Beautiful, soft bokeh that is generous even at f/4 thanks to the 135mm focal length.
Good sharpness even wide open, with some copies described as tack sharp into the extreme corners.
Very lovely rendering in both color and black and white.
Extremely affordable for the quality of images it can produce.
Fun and easy to get good results with on digital bodies, including mirrorless cameras like the Sony A7 series and Olympus Pen F.

What people dislike

Very poor flare resistance with severe veiling flare, even on overcast days.
Significant corner darkening (vignetting) wide open at f/4 and f/5.6.
Noticeable sample variation, including uneven focus ring resistance.
Resolution never matches modern lenses or the Leica Tele-Elmar.
Long close focusing distance of 2.5 m limits how close you can get.
Aluminum barrels attract scratches easily.

Pro Tips

Always use a lens hood; a generic 40.5mm thread hood dramatically improves flare and contrast, though it won't fix every situation.
Stop down to f/5.6 to boost contrast and reduce corner darkening.
Avoid shooting directly into bright light or backlit scenes where veiling flare is worst.
The clickless aperture ring makes this lens well suited to video work.
Great for portraits, nature, and general telephoto work on digital mirrorless bodies where it is easy to adapt.

Sources (1)

Web-grounded synthesissecondary

The Jupiter-11 135mm f/4 is a Soviet telephoto lens derived from the German Zeiss Sonnar 135mm f/4, part of the broad family of Jupiter lenses that copied and continued Zeiss designs after World War II. According to the reviews, early versions may actually use Zeiss glass produced in Germany, while later ones may carry different coatings. The lens was produced over a long span; the reviewed copies date from as early as 1959 (an aluminum-bodied example) to as late as 1991 (serial numbers encode the production year in the first two digits). The M42 version reviewed by one commenter is made of brass and is notably heavier than the aluminum variants. It has a cult following largely because it is inexpensive (starting around $45 on eBay) yet capable of producing 'superbe' images with pleasing bokeh at a long focal length. One reviewer summed up its charm by noting he doesn't shoot test charts and brick walls, only life. No established nicknames are evidenced in the reviews.

https://phillipreeve.net/blog/review-jupiter-11-135mm-4-0/https://www.reddit.com/r/VintageLenses/comments/nxn20r/underrated_jupiter_11a_135mm_f4/https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4011936https://www.lensorra.com/product/jupiter-11-4-135-lens/https://www.oldcamsbyjens.com/products/jupiter-11-135mm-f4